Definition and prevalence
early scientific inquiries into sexting, carried out between 2008 and 2013, focused chiefly on teenagers and unseasoned adults and the prevalence of sexting. preponderance statistics varied widely, however, owing to inconsistencies in definitions and data sampling. For case, some researchers lone examined the commit of nude or closely nude images, whereas others asked participants how much they had received sexually indicative words. Some researchers did not clearly specify sexting at all. In virtual terms, this intend that sexting could be defined as anything from aphrodisiac talk, such as suggesting intimate action or making sexualize comments, to more denotative displays of sex, such as sending nude or closely nude photos. Data collection methods besides varied. For exemplar, some researchers used anonymous on-line surveys, and others used telephone interviews on landlines. These differences led to identical dissimilar prevalence rates of sexting, ranging from a first gear of about 2.5 percentage for sending intimate photos ( among 10- to 17-year-olds ) to a high of about 80 percentage for receiving sexual text ( among young adults ).
As sexting became more popular as a target of scientific question, researchers broadened their setting and began to recognize different types of sexting. This led to the designation of consistent trends. For exercise, sexting was found to be more park among young adults and older teenagers than among younger teenagers and older adults. Individuals of all ages tended to send sexually implicative or explicit words more much than pictures, and sexting was found to be more coarse within the context of perpetrate relationships than among those who were dating casually or those who were not in a romanticist relationship. Although some researchers identified links between sexting prevalence and behaviours such as drug misuse and alcohol practice or bad sexual behavior ( e.g., sexual activity with multiple partners or sexual activity without a condom ), other researchers found that individuals who engaged in sexting were not more likely to engage in hazardous demeanor.
similarly, while sexting has been associated with intimate natural process ( i, those who sext are more probable to be sexually active agent than those who do not sext ), some studies suggest that the association is weak. In accession, whether sexting tends to precede sexual activity or frailty versa is unclear. In terms of kinship health, sexting has been associated with both dependable and insecure attachment styles, and although some inquiry suggests that sexting might be beneficial to adult couples in romantic relationships, the tell to support this has been inconsistent.