The Importance of Health to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
March 25, 2015 By: Anna Zelivianskaia
M.D. Candidate 2016 – University of Illinois-Chicago College of Medicine
“Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane.” –Martin Luther King Jr.
Health care is not listed as a basic homo justly in most constitutions, including our own. Yet I suspect the majority of citizens of any country would agree with the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. ’ south argument. Most people rightly believe that access to health care is implied in the social contract. It surely is for citizens who live in countries with single-payer aesculapian systems. however, why is healthcare an imply human right ? Besides the intuitive palpate that as a future doctor, I should care for anyone who walks through my doors, I could not explain why healthcare is so transparently intertwined with judge and citizenship.
In a across-the-board sense, what are the basic human rights ? The knee-jerk answer from the american experience is life, liberty, and the avocation of happiness. The Bill of Rights reflects these principles : exemption of lecture and the right to bear arms fall under the “ autonomy ” category ; fear from excessive bail and unusual punishment allow for the avocation of happiness. so far, as I tread far into my checkup educate, I realize that health care is interchangeable with the right to life. Preventing a person from accessing the aesculapian system is condemning them to death.
Read more: Gastritis – Symptoms and causes
I am presently on the general music wards—the bread and butter of a checkup student ’ s educate. As I started the roller coaster of inpatient care, I expected long hours, unmanageable patients, and even spending a solid come of time documenting my every move. What I did not expect was talking about medical insurance ten times a day. When my team creates and all right tunes a care plan, we constantly have to check what indemnity the affected role is on, if our hospital is in network, and which hoops we need to jump through for a specialist referral. And that is for the patients who actually have insurance. even at a state hospital, like ours, which is authentically committed to serving the under-served, the majority of patients who do not have insurance do not make it through our doors.
good like any other hospital, there are times when we can not provide a especial medication or serve to a patient because the affected role ’ second indemnity prohibits it. recently another scholar asked what happens to these patients. apart from the fleeting frustration I feel every clock time we have to limit person ’ second care, I had not in truth thought about it. I assumed patients who are denied care would get it somewhere else. possibly they would receive a slightly less effective medication—but they would get by somehow. But some patients go bankrupt after being taken to an out-of-network hospital by an ambulance. And some patients die without their treatment. tied choosing the slenderly less effective medication that the insurance will actually pay for can shorten a person ’ s life span as their disease slowly gnaws at their “ quality of life years. ”
furthermore, what about the patients we never evening see ? Their ghosts will haunt my career and the extra years not lived trickle wastefully through the cracks of our break system. Health care is a homo right because it allows you to live fully. good health gives you the shore leave to contribute to society in the most prolific way. Having a home in the medical system allows you to pursue happiness in the fine things in life. From my point of view, health caution is embedded in every one of our basic homo rights. Our medical system needs to live up to that high standard. The only way to protect the basic homo rights of all citizens is to institute a single-payer health system that removes all fiscal barriers to necessary care .