Are Food-Based Supplements Really Better than Synthetic Versions? | Deanna Minich

Photo: OlgaChernyak/Shutterstock.com

many people rely on nutritional supplements either to tackle a health trouble or ensure they do not succumb to deficiencies that might create one. Taking supplements has remained fairly stable over the past few decades, with about 52 percentage of american adults reporting taking supplements within the previous month for the years 2011 – 2012 based on data from NHANES ( National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey ). however, using multivitamin/multi-mineral varieties has decreased some over the past few years, with 31 percentage of adults in the US taking multivitamin/multi-mineral supplements compared to 37 percentage from 1999 – 2000 .
frequently, the best room to start to consume the necessary vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and early nutrients is from solid foods in your diet. however, what happens when you can not get sufficient levels through what you eat ? If you are like most people, you turn to dietary supplements. From there, you can choose to purchase synthetic nutrients or natural ones derived from whole foods .
many supplements with a whole-food root claim they are superior to the synthetic option. Is there actually a deviation, or is it fair marketing nonsense ? Let ’ s see what the literature has to say.

Synergy of Foods and Nutrients
unharmed foods have the repute of being superior to taking supplements in large part due to food synergy, or the beneficial relationship between food constituents. specific vitamins and minerals interact with one another, some increasing the other ’ south effectiveness and others inhibiting it. There are besides many phytochemicals that work together in ways that science is barely beginning to identify. Macronutrients besides impact the assimilation and practice of sealed nutrients, particularly lipids in the lipid-soluble vitamins .
For exemplar, one study found that consuming avocado increased the bioavailability of the provitamin-A carotenoids in tomato sauce and carrots. Using two classify studies, the researchers tested the affect of consuming avocado on the absorption of vitamin A arsenic well as other carotenoids, vitamin E, and vitamin K. In one study, the test meal included a novel high-beta-carotene tomato sauce, and the other analyze used carrots. In both studies, the participants consumed the examination meals with breakfast and then ate control meals with restrict vitamin A and carotenoids at lunch .
Eating the avocado with the tomato sauce led to a 2.4-fold increase in the levels of beta-carotene and a 4.6-fold increase in AUC retinyl esters. For the meal containing the carrots, the avocado led to a 6.6-fold AUC addition in beta-carotene, a 4.8-fold AUC increase in alpha-carotene, and a 12.6-fold increase in AUC of retinyl esters compared to those who ate the lapp meal without the avocado. There was besides a 15-fold increase in vitamin K. Those who consumed the avocado besides experienced an increase in vitamin A conversion. When eating the tomato sauce meal, the mean conversion was 22 percentage without the avocado and 33 percentage with it. Most likely, this effect was due to the lipids in the avocado helping with the preoccupation of the carotenoid .
Another exemplar comes from a review sketch looking at the health benefits of apples. The authors found that the phytochemicals in apples enhanced the overall antioxidant capacity of the fruit. Despite having merely 5 magnesium of vitamin C, the phytochemicals worked synergistically to provide the equivalent of 1,500 milligram of vitamin C in antioxidant activity .
  Natural Forms or Biologically Active Options
In summation to food-sourced supplements, some arguments state that certain vitamins require a certain shape, frequently described as a lifelike imprint or a biologically active version. One vitamin with some reports that the natural form might have more efficacy than the man-made form is vitamin E. many supplements use a celluloid form known as all-rac-alpha-tocopherol, which has eight potential stereoisomers. Natural vitamin E has 100 percentage of the RRR-alpha-tocopherol stereoisomer. Studies have found that the RRR-alpha-tocopherol stereoisomer is more efficiently absorbed, making it more bioavailable .
In one study that looked at data from the Irish National Adult Nutrition Survey ( NANS ) 2008 –2010, which was a cross-section dietary sketch, the researchers compared the entire vitamin E consumption between all-rac-alpha vitamin e and the RRR stereoisomer. When considering vitamin E inhalation from all sources, 100 percentage of the participants met the recommend inhalation, which was set at 12 mg/day. After adjusting for the all-rac-alpha-tocopherol ( or the celluloid auxiliary form ) through using a bioactivity proportion of 0.74 ( all-rac to RRR ), the share remained at 100 percentage of those who met the intake, although when looking at merely food sources, alone 68.4 percentage of women met the intake while men still met the RDA .
This sketch found that the plasma distribution differed based on what type of addendum the participants took. In supplement users using the high all-rac-alpha-tocopherol options, there was only 82 percentage of RRR-alpha vitamin e in the lineage, which was importantly lower than non-users and high-RRR users ( these were at 91.5 percentage and 93.1 percentage respectively ). For other stereoisomers, the RSS low and high all-rac supplements users had higher percentages than those who took the RRR supplement. high all-rac supplement users besides had a significantly higher percentage of the RS isomer. There was no meaning difference in the 2S-steroisomers .
One study comparing all-rac-alpha vitamin e with RRR, or natural vitamin E, in nurse mothers found that both forms of the supplement increased the concentration of the vitamin in the mother ’ randomness colostrum, but the lifelike form was more effective at the undertaking. In a double-blind, randomized control study, women were divided into three groups : a master group that did not take any treatment, a group taking natural RRR, and one taking synthetic all-rac. Blood and milk colostrum were collected and screened for vitamin E levels. There was no significant dispute in the serum levels of alpha-TOH in all three groups of the study, and none had a lack of the vitamin. When looking at the alpha-TOH concentrations at 0 and 24 hours, the women who had no treatment had similar concentrations for both. The append groups both exhibited an increase, with those taking the natural interpretation having a 57.6 percentage increase compared to a 39 percentage increase in the synthetic group, which was statistically significant. additionally, those who took the natural supplement had an average of 49.6 percentage higher concentration of alpha-TOH in their colostrum compared to the man-made. There was no correlation between serum levels and milk levels .
Another common vitamin with synthetic versus natural forms is vitamin K. Traditionally, vitamin K supplements used a synthetic version known as K1, but it has become more park to find the natural menaquinone-7, or MK-7. One analyze compared the absorption and efficacy of MK-7 and K1. Participants, who were healthy men and women between the ages of 25 and 35, took either vitamin K1 or MK-7 once a day at either breakfast or dinner. They besides did not consume vitamin K-rich foods .
There were four different studies : a bioavailability study that included an oil consumption, a dose-response relative, prolonged intake looking at osteocalcin carboxylation, and the affect on oral anticoagulants. Although both had like absorption levels, the MK-7 had a much longer half life, which allowed for more static levels in the blood and a higher accumulation after taking for a period of time. This collection could cause issues if it reaches toxicity levels. The researchers found that when taking a vitamin K addendum daily, just 25 ug/day of MK-7 is more effective than 100 ug/day of K1, thanks to the longer half life and subsequent collection. This besides led to a more complete carboxylation of osteocalcin. MK-7 besides had a stronger impact on anticoagulants, demonstrating a potential for more damage.

Natural Versus Synthetic Versions of Nutrients
There are limit studies comparing whole-food based and synthetic vitamins. One study looked at a fresh plant-based calcium supplement and compared its impact on human osteoblast cells with two commonly used calcium salts. The plant-based calcium, AlgaeCal, was sourced from south american marine alga and contained 73 trace minerals in total, of which 28 to 31 percentage of it is calcium and 2 to 4 percentage is magnesium. The other calcium varieties were calcium carbonate and calcium citrate .
This was a cellular telephone discipline, and the osteoblast cells were treated with the AlgaeCal, calcium carbonate, and calcium citrate with and without vitamin D3 added. There was a significantly higher grade of osteoblast activity compared to the manipulate, the calcium carbonate, and the calcium citrate. There was besides an addition in the calcium deposition, or mineralization, in those treated with the AlgaeCal compared to the manipulate, calcium carbonate, and calcium citrate, including with the accession of vitamin D3. As this is a cell learn, it does not mean that the lapp findings would take plaza in a person. Additionally, some of the efficacy of the append might come from its inclusion of other bone-benefiting minerals rather than that it comes from a more natural source .
In a mouse study, researchers compared magnesium and calcium from seaweed to synthetic versions ( calcium carbonate and magnesium oxide ). The rats were divided into four groups : sham-operated group, ovariectomized group, ovariectomized with synthetic calcium and magnesium, and ovariectomized with seaweed minerals. The seaweed contained 33 percentage calcium and 3.2 percentage magnesium along with other trace minerals, including selenium, iron, phosphate, boron, and manganese. The researchers found a alike intestinal concentration of the calcium. however, the seaweed calcium press out increased the strength and bone mineral concentration of the femoral bone in the rats .
Lycopene has been shown to have an inverse relationship with cardiovascular disease risk. In one revue article comparing studies looking at lycopene supplements on CVD gamble factors with a diet rich in tomatoes ( a rich source of lycopene ), the researchers found a meek benefit to tomatoes over lycopene supplements in terms of oxidise LDL in healthy, non-smoking individuals. There was no improvement in AOX results, a marker for antioxidant capacitance, in studies on lycopene supplementation, while two out of 10 studies on tomatoes did show some improvement. A few studies showed some promise in preventing oxidative damage with lycopene supplements, but 10 of 17 recover tomatoes to be effective in decreasing lipid peroxidation and other markers of oxidative stress, showing more data supporting tomatoes over lycopene supplements .
When looking at excitement, several studies showed both lycopene and tomato products efficaciously reducing inflammatory markers, including CRP. however, there was some incompatibility with both. Both supplements and tomato products showed promise for reducing blood imperativeness. The researchers concluded that there was more attest for consuming tomato preferably than taking lycopene supplements, specially in regards to LDL oxidation and oxidative damage. however, there was some evidence indicating lycopene supplementation might be favorable for lowering rake coerce in hypertensive individuals. There is meek support for tomatoes rather than lycopene supplements to improve lipid metamorphosis. Tomatoes might have come out ahead, but there are promising findings for lycopene supplements as well, and the indigence for more target studies .
A taxonomic review looked at studies comparing synthetic and natural vitamin C. Some animal studies did demonstrate a significant increase in assimilation and vitamin C level in the organs with natural vitamin C compared to celluloid options. Some studies demonstrated no difference, but for one celebrated study, the explanation was that the acerola cherry training ended up with about no flavonoids due to the dilution and early infusion homework .
additionally, this study compared this vitamin C yield excerpt with blackcurrant juice. In the like review, the researchers found that in human studies, there was little difference in the urine and/or plasma bioavailability of vitamin C after taking synthetic supplements or from fruits, fruit juices, and vegetables. Studies besides found comparable bioavailability between synthetic and natural forms of vitamin C .
In a randomized, steady-state study in 36 young, non-smoking adult males, the researchers found no meaning differences in the bioavailability of the vitamin C. The researchers compared consuming a half of a gold kiwifruit or 50 milligram of vitamin C in a chewable pad over a period of six weeks. Both groups experienced an increase in plasma, skeletal muscle tissue, and leukocytes vitamin C levels during the six weeks of the test. however, there was no significant remainder between the two groups, and the same was for urinary and seminal levels of vitamin C. Thus, both seemed to work merely vitamin a well .
In one study on lactating women, the researchers found that the vitamin C from foods was better absorbed compared to that from supplements, and it thereby passed into the breast milk more efficiently .
Conclusion: A Need for More Studies
With all of the health benefits of eating unharmed foods, it intuitively feels as though supplements made from whole foods would have greater benefits than synthetic versions. There is limited tell proving this theory, however. Some predict studies suggest it might be probable that this is the case, but it is besides soon to make a authoritative statement. And there is some tell pointing to certain versions of vitamins and minerals having a better efficacy, such as the natural forms of vitamins E, K, D.

It is besides crucial to remember that most addendum brands that start with whole foods besides execute a certain total of process to increase the amounts of vitamins and minerals and to standardize drug, which might lead to some of the early benefits of the foods ( such as certain phytochemicals ) not remaining in sufficient amounts to work synergistically in the same way as they do when you eat the wholly foods. thus, flush if you choose whole-food supplements, you are still not consuming solid foods .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *