Is ear sex really a thing?

q : About a year ago, I was pretending to read my boyfriend’s mind and jokingly said, “You want to put it in my ear.” Since then, I have seen references to ear sex (aural sex?) everywhere! There’s even a holiday (Take It in the Ear Day, on December 8), and I was reading a book just now in which the author mentions how much she hates getting come in her ear. So while I am honestly not trying to yuck someone’s yum, I do have two questions. First, is this really a thing? And second, how does it work? I mean, I like it when my boyfriend kisses my ears, but I don’t think I’d get that hot from him putting his penis there. It just seems loud. Can you enlighten me? —An Understanding Requested About Listeners A : ear arouse is a thing. But we need to distinguish between auralism, AURAL, and an ear juju. People into auralism are sexually aroused by sounds—it could be a voice or music or sex noises. ( sex noises can arouse about anyone who hears them, of course, so technically we ’ re all auralists. ) An ear fetish, on the early hand, is a kind of partialism, i.e., a intimate interest in one separate of the body ( frequently parts not typically found in pants ). A foot fetish is a partialism, for example, as is an auricle fetish or an armpit fetish. Most ear fetish stuff—including the thousands of auricle fetish videos on YouTube—is about tug, rubbing, or licking person ’ s ear and not about fucking person in the ear or coming in person ’ sulfur auricle duct. Dicks don ’ t paroxysm in ear canals, and blasting semen into person ’ s ear could cause a filthy ear infection. So both are bad practices good avoided—but, hey, if PIE ( penis in auricle ) sex is actually a matter, I invite any hard-core ear kinksters out there reading this to write in and explain precisely how that works. q : I have a particular fetish that I’ve never fully disclosed to anybody. My ultimate fantasy is to be stripped of my assets by a woman and then (most importantly) made homeless. I like dressing up dirty—face, clothing, and all—and even going so far as to look through garbage cans. My question is this: Is it moral to live out this fantasy, considering the plight of homeless people? —Desiring Interesting Role-Play That’s Yucky

A : I ’ megabyte not gon na lecture you about how homelessness is a calamity for individuals and a home crisis that the administration of Orange Julius Caesar is improbable to prioritize. Just like AURAL, DIRTY, I ’ thousand not hera to yuck anyone ’ south yum. But this is decidedly a fantasy—morally speaking—that can ’ metric ton be in full realized. You ’ re turned on by the remember of a barbarous charwoman taking absolutely everything from you and leaving you homeless ? Great. Find a woman who ’ south into findom ( fiscal domination ) and give her some or most of your money and play snip up on the weekends and sleep in her backyard. But preceptor ’ thyroxine give her everything and actually wind up dispossessed, DIRTY, because then you ’ ll wind up competing for scarce shelter beds and other resources with men, women, and children who didn ’ thymine choose to become dispossessed because it made their dicks hard. There ’ randomness nothing moral about making their betroth worse than it already is. ultimately, DIRTY, while you ’ re able to fantasize about being stripped of your assets and left homeless, there are real people out there who have nothing and don ’ thymine find anything about being homelessness arousing. Want to be poorer ? Donate a boastfully chunk of your assets to homeless shelters and/or nonprofits that assist those experiencing homelessness in your area. q : I’ve never admitted this to anyone: The idea of committing suicide turns me on sexually. I recognize how crazy that is, and I want to emphasize that I’m not suicidal. I’m not depressed, I love living, and despite this sexual impulse, I don’t want to kill myself. I’m turned on by the fantasy of hanging myself, but that’s not really how I want my life to end. (To be clear: Autoerotic asphyxiation gets a lot of press, but that’s not the situation here. Asphyxiation itself isn’t my kink, and other methods of committing suicide also turn me on.) My question is this: Given that I don’t want these fantasy scenarios to ever become reality, should I indulge the fantasy through healthy, safe play with a responsible partner or should I try to repress it and shut it down? I’m worried that if I indulge the fantasies through safe scenarios, I might reach a point where the safety precautions interfere with the thrill. On the other hand, I know that trying to repress sexual desires is a hopeless endeavor and trying to keep these fantasies in check might result in a scenario where they boil over and I end up engaging in riskier behavior than I would have otherwise. —Horny and Nervous Guy’s Endangering Deeds

A : You ’ re not actually self-destructive, right ? I know you already said you weren ’ thymine, HANGED, but I want to double-check. Because fantasizing about killing yourself—for whatever reason—technically counts as self-destructive ideation. If you or anyone else reading this is contemplating suicide, please reach out to person you trust. Ask for assistant. Stick around. ( Some resources : National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, 1-800-273-8255 ; the Trevor Project, 1-866-488-7386 ; Trans Lifeline, 877-565-8860. ) Okay, HANGED, I ’ thousand going to take you at your news : You love being alive and don ’ t actually want to kill yourself any more than a reasonable person into Master/slave role-play actually wants to own a human being or be enslaved. But while I agree that repressing sexual desires is a hopeless endeavor, HANGED, “ can ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate be repressed ” international relations and security network ’ t the entirely factor we have to take into consideration as we contemplate acting on our sexual fantasies. There are two early crucial considerations ( at least ! ) : Can the act be performed consensually ? Can the act be enjoyed with minimal risk of permanent wave injury ? Your crimp can decidedly be performed consensually, and there are ways to minimize the risks of harm—and I ’ m not talking about alone sticking your head in an Easy-Bake Oven. I ’ thousand talking about finding a responsible/indulgent/macabre partner who ’ mho uncoerced to indulge/assist/monitor. Yours is a crick that can be explored only during supervised play, otherwise you run the risk of fucking up and by chance hanging yourself. You can never do this solo. thus if you don ’ t have a creditworthy and imperturbable partner, HANGED, you ’ ll have to stick to your right field hand and your resource. q : Bi guy here, who’s way OK with the use of “fag” or “faggot” in the right context. And what FAGS wrote in about last week—a boyfriend who wants to be called “faggot” while she talks negatively about his cock—is absolutely the right context. There’s an evolution in meaning taking place right now, Dan. These days, “fag” is less about sexual preference and more about sexual submission. A submissive man? Gay or straight? He’s a fag. I’ve been serviced by both hetero and homo faggots and have enjoyed myself, as have the fags who sucked my cock or did my housework. Go on to Tumblr and see for yourself. (Also: I have a sneaky suspicion that sparks would fly if FAGS raised the subject of cuckoldry with her boyfriend.) —Bi Guy Into Faggots
A : Thanks for sharing, BGIF. vanadium

Download the Savage Lovecast every Tuesday at savagelovecast.com .

reservoir : https://www.bestofcalgary.city
Category : Sex Tips

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.